I am the FIRST
regular 4 post ff
infinite scroll 4 pff
Corporate political donations fizzle in wake of Jan. 6 insurrection
The January attack on the U.S. Capitol had a larger impact than previously known on corporate political giving, new campaign finance filings indicate.
Why it matters: The immediate and intense political fallout over the insurrection pushed scores of companies to announce a pause or end to political donations. New numbers suggest an even larger chilling effect, with companies that had been quiet publicly also forgoing donations.
- Corporate PACs for some firms that didn't announce post-Jan. 6 changes to their political giving — such as Sysco, Assurant, Citizens Financial and Pioneer Natural Resources — didn't give a dime to federal candidates in the first two months of the year.
- All four donated to at least one political candidate during the first two months of the 2020 election cycle.
Other companies that announced internal reviews appear to be remaining on the sidelines.
- United Airlines, CVS and Chevron announced they would reevaluate those policies. None donated to a federal political candidate in January or February.
Firms that did announce changes to their political donation policies appear to be staying true.
- The corporate PAC for financial services company Charles Schwab dissolved entirely this week, after the company said it would abandon its political giving program. The PAC donated its remaining funds, nearly $150,000, to charity.
- Companies that said they would suspend all political donations — including McDonald's, General Motors and BAE Systems — reported following through.
Even companies that swore off donations just to the members of Congress who opposed certifying President Biden's Electoral College win appear to be going even further.
- Mastercard and Walgreens both reported zero federal political contributions in January and February, significant drops from their giving in the first two months of 2019.
- Eli Lilly donated $30,000 in February to the Democrats' House and Senate campaign arms, but none to the equivalent Republican groups — a departure from bipartisan giving during the equivalent periods of past election cycles.
What they're saying: "I definitely think that (the Jan. 6 attack) will have an impact long term" on political giving, said Kristin Brackemyre, director of political action committee and government relations at the Public Affairs Council.
- "Organizations are much more aware that every single contribution they make, they need to be really thoughtful and ... need to evaluate whether this could be controversial, and who it would be controversial to," Leighty said.
Yes, but: Not all of corporate America has been so reticent to reengage. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently announced it would not cut off members of Congress just because they voted against certifying the election.
- Nor have corporate PACs that swore off donations been the moderating force that many hoped. In fact, they could have the opposite effect, encouraging fringe donors.
- Firebrand Republicans such as Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) also have found that any loss in contributions they may have faced has been supplanted by a growth in grassroots support.
The bottom line: The Jan. 6 attack didn't just turn many major companies against some prominent GOP lawmakers; it showed how toxic American politics are right now.
- That's forcing companies to balance the possibility of controversy with their immediate goals in Washington.
- "Overall, I think corporate America wants to be politically engaged," Leighty said. "They just want to make sure that they're doing it in a responsible and tactful way."
Biden recess plan omits Afghanistan
The White House is downplaying Afghanistan in outside-the-Beltway events during the August congressional recess, hoping voters will pay more attention to President Biden's big spending plans.
Why it matters: Democrats privately fear political blowback, even though the White House insists voters aren't talking about the Kabul calamity.
What they're saying: White House senior adviser Neera Tanden didn't mention Afghanistan once when Axios asked her how much the events of the past week will affect what Biden can accomplish on the Hill.
- "We developed our plan around August recess in July," she said. "We planned for a cadence of multiple events a week around Build Back Better and infrastructure and we have been operationalizing that plan and will continue to do so."
- "So we’re going to continue that work, and this agenda is important to the public."
Between the lines: The Atlantic's Peter Nicholas argued in a piece published Friday titled, "Biden Is Betting Americans Will Forget About Afghanistan," that the White House is "relying on Americans’ notoriously short-term memory."
- The White House insists that Democratic lawmakers are excited to have Cabinet members hosting events in their districts around infrastructure, climate and energy, health care and the economy.
- But communications strategiescan only do so much amid the reality and images emerging from Afghanistan.
Behind the scenes: Since joining the White House in May as senior adviser to Biden, Tanden has kept a low profile. But her role, after losing a confirmation fight to be Biden's budget director, is setting her up to have outsized power in helping sell the president's agenda.
- When Tanden helped create the White House plan for selling Democrats' agenda during the August recess, Afghanistan wasn't among the policy priorities to discuss with voters. It still isn't.
Aides are tracking whether opposition surfaces at vulnerable House Democrats' town halls and district event this month.
- "There are numerous components of Build Back Better that are incredibly popular amongst Republicans," Tanden told Axios.
- "It’s challenging for them to create the kind of energy they did in past eras," she added, pointing out that the White House is seeing nothing like the emotionalism around the Affordable Care Act during former President Obama's first term.
According to internal White House documents obtained by Axios, aides have tracked 18 town halls or events with Democratic lawmakers this month.
- At least sixwere virtual or by phone. So while the White House says there's been "no organized opposition" from angry Republicans, as seen in past August recesses, that would be hard to know.
- An event with Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) allowed only written questions — and those weren’t documented. Instead, a White House document notes that the senator "discussed infrastructure."
Taliban takes over U.S. war chest given to Afghan military
The Taliban just gained a massive new war chest, complete with U.S.-made Humvees, planes, helicopters, night-vision goggles and drones, Reuters reports.
State of play: Video shows militants inspecting lines of vehicles and opening crates of new firearms, communications gear and even military drones. Some of the equipment was given by the U.S.
- U.S. officials aren't just worried about the Taliban using the weapons against civilians. They're also concerned the equipment could be seized by ISIS or handed over to China or Russia.
Details: The equipment includes over 2,000 armored vehicles, and up to 40 aircrafts, Reuters notes, citing an intelligence assessment.
The Biden administration is considering launching airstrikes against the larger equipment, officials told Reuters.
- Yes, but: They also fear that such a move could provoke the Taliban at a time where the U.S. is focusing on evacuating people from Afghanistan.
What they're saying: "Everything that hasn't been destroyed is the Taliban's now," one U.S. official told Reuters.
- "We have already seen Taliban fighters armed with U.S.-made weapons they seized from the Afghan forces. This poses a significant threat to the United States and our allies," Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told Reuters.
There was no way to withdraw from Afghanistan "without chaos ensuing," Biden says
President Biden said he saw no way to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan "without chaos ensuing" in an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos that will air Wednesday evening.
Why it matters: Critics have slammed the Biden administration for failing to plan a measured and managed departure, which the Taliban used to their advantage. But in his first on-camera interview since the fall of Afghanistan, Biden defended the withdrawal, calling it "a simple choice."
What he's saying: Five weeks ago, Biden had assured Americans that the "likelihood there’s going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely."
- But on Wednesday, Biden told Stephanopoulos that "the idea that somehow, there's a way to have gotten out without chaos ensuing — I don't know how that happens."
- When asked if that was "priced" into Biden's decision, Biden answered in the affirmative before backtracking.
- "Now exactly what happened, I've not priced in," he said. "Look, one of the things we didn't know is what the Taliban would do in terms of trying to keep people from getting out."
- He reiterated that the Afghan government, whose U.S.-backed leader, Ashraf Ghani, fled on Sunday as the Taliban closed in on Kabul, was at fault for the country's collapse.
- "It was a simple choice. If I said, 'we're gonna stay,' then we'd better be prepared to put a whole lot hell of a lot more troops in."
Worth noting: The president grew defensivewhen Stephanopoulos alluded to photos of hundreds of people crammed into a C-17.
- "That was four days ago, five days ago!" Biden interrupted.
- The photo was taken on Monday.
Catch up quick: Since Sunday, Afghans have fled their homes and pleaded with the world to open their borders. The U.S. is working to relocate allied Afghans and their families.
- The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Wednesday that the U.S. military's intelligence did not indicate that Afghanistan would fall as quickly as it did to the Taliban.
- Former Afghan President Ghani said he is in "talks to return to Afghanistan." He claims he left Kabul to prevent bloodshed.
- Senate Democrats have vowed to investigate the U.S.'s "flawed" pullout of troops.